<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Faster-Than-the-Wind on re:creation</title><link>https://blog.jlipps.com/tags/faster-than-the-wind/</link><description>Recent content in Faster-Than-the-Wind on re:creation</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.jlipps.com/tags/faster-than-the-wind/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Relay: Dead Downwind Faster Than The Wind</title><link>https://blog.jlipps.com/2010/12/relay-dead-downwind-faster-than-the-wind/</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=530</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;A few weeks ago, I came across the description of an extremely inspiring engineering project at &lt;a href="http://kimballlivingston.com/?p=3971"&gt;Kimball Livingston&amp;rsquo;s blog&lt;/a&gt; (pictures and videos taken from there). Basically, conventional wisdom in wind propulsion is that, whatever the wind is propelling, that object can&amp;rsquo;t actually go faster than the wind unless it uses up some kind of stored energy (fuel, rowing, etc&amp;hellip;). Rick Cavallaro thought otherwise, put his ideas out there for how it might work to go dead downwind, faster than the wind, and was roundly ridiculed by pretty much everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago, I came across the description of an extremely inspiring engineering project at <a href="http://kimballlivingston.com/?p=3971">Kimball Livingston&rsquo;s blog</a> (pictures and videos taken from there). Basically, conventional wisdom in wind propulsion is that, whatever the wind is propelling, that object can&rsquo;t actually go faster than the wind unless it uses up some kind of stored energy (fuel, rowing, etc&hellip;). Rick Cavallaro thought otherwise, put his ideas out there for how it might work to go dead downwind, faster than the wind, and was roundly ridiculed by pretty much everyone.</p>
<p>Instead of being disheartened, he put together a team to build the strange propellor-shaped sails that he thought would carry a vehicle faster than the wind. They crafted their land-boat to precise yet hand-made specifications (even using a bicycle wheel!), and set out to test Cavallaro&rsquo;s crazy theory. Here&rsquo;s an initially slow-paced video of the attempt:</p>
<p>Ultimately, they clocked the craft at 2.8x the speed of the wind! This is what I would call ridiculously awesome, and a reminder that physics, if we needed a reminder, is really interesting. I also admire the story of the iconoclastic scientist whose theories were at first mocked and then, not simply proved theoretically possible in a mathematical equation or a lab, but tested out on the salt flats with a guy in a helmet sitting in it! I guess the point is that there are plenty of good ideas out there that just haven&rsquo;t been tried&mdash;and that&rsquo;s something I think I often <em>do</em> need a reminder of.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://kimballlivingston.com/?p=3971">Livingston&rsquo;s blog post</a> for a detailed story of what happened. There&rsquo;s also a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPvGTjmn9y0">Discovery Channel video</a> with interviews, etc&hellip;</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>