<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Sci-Fi on re:creation</title><link>https://blog.jlipps.com/tags/sci-fi/</link><description>Recent content in Sci-Fi on re:creation</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:39:27 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.jlipps.com/tags/sci-fi/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Things I Like 10-2005</title><link>https://blog.jlipps.com/2005/10/things-i-like-10-2005/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:39:27 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=300</guid><description>So that I will not be accused of only making lists of heavy and depressing stuff like doubts, here is installment #1 of &amp;ldquo;Things I Like&amp;rdquo;! I have put &amp;ldquo;10-2005&amp;rdquo; in the title, which implies but does not do anything like promise that this will be a monthly series. The list is not supposed to be particularly deep, so please do not feel injured that I do not mention our relationship, or Jesus, or anything like that. But do remember that I spend most of my days coding, and so a lot of this will be my inner nerd coming out. Here is the list, in no particular order:</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that I will not be accused of only making lists of heavy and depressing stuff like doubts, here is installment #1 of &ldquo;Things I Like&rdquo;! I have put &ldquo;10-2005&rdquo; in the title, which implies but does not do anything like promise that this will be a monthly series. The list is not supposed to be particularly deep, so please do not feel injured that I do not mention our relationship, or Jesus, or anything like that. But do remember that I spend most of my days coding, and so a lot of this will be my inner nerd coming out. Here is the list, in no particular order:</p>
<ul>
<li>Semifreddis cinnamon swirl bread</li>
<li>Drinking <a href="http://store.teavana.com/brewandtouch.html">tea</a> again, since it&rsquo;s cold enough to</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/ref=br_ss_hs/103-9406616-1604666?platform=gurupa&amp;url=index%3Dblended&amp;field-keywords=the+velvet+teen&amp;Go.x=0&amp;Go.y=0&amp;Go=Go">The Velvet Teen</a></li>
<li>Jimmy Eat World&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000B8GTOC/qid=1130519048/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-9406616-1604666?v=glance&amp;s=music&amp;n=507846">Stay on My Side Tonight EP</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000AJJNPY/qid=1130519136/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/103-9406616-1604666?v=glance&amp;s=music">Takk</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.stewdio.org/jed/">Jed&rsquo;s Other Poem</a></li>
<li>Installing <a href="http://www.kubuntu.org/">Kubuntu</a> and trying to get wireless drivers working</li>
<li><a href="http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/">Ndiswrapper</a> (see previous item)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1582346038/ref=pd_bbs_null_2/103-9406616-1604666?v=glance&amp;s=music">Jonathan Strange &amp; Mr. Norrell</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.rubyonrails.com/">Ruby on Rails</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.unixgeeks.org/security/newbie/unix/cron-1.html">Cron</a> + PHP for the win in easy archive/backup</li>
<li>&ldquo;tail -f access_log | grep <em>IP</em>&rdquo; for tracking use patterns on this site in real time, and &ldquo;tail -f access_log&rdquo; in general for a good procrastination method</li>
<li>The <a href="http://worldofwarcraft.com">World of Warcraft</a> grind</li>
<li><a href="http://www.drinksmixer.com/drink13.html">Flaming Dr. Peppers</a></li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.paloaltoonline.com/moonlight_run/2005_results/10Kmdiv.txt">Palo Alto Moonlight 10k</a> (for complicated reasons having to do with not paying the sign-up fee, I ran as &ldquo;Ryan Frederick&rdquo;, in the 30-39 division, though I am still only 23)</li>
<li>Intense ultimate frisbee with friends</li>
<li>Dropping temperatures and overcast skies</li>
<li><a href="http://pasta.allrecipes.com/az/PdThi.asp">Pad Thai</a> all the time</li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0439784549/ref=pd_bbs_null_1/103-9406616-1604666?v=glance&amp;s=music">Harry Potter VI</a> out loud with Nyffy (the Chris one)</li>
<li>The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0000AQS0F/103-9406616-1604666?v=glance&amp;n=5174&amp;s=music&amp;v=glance">Firefly Complete Series</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0002PYS7Y/103-9406616-1604666?v=glance&amp;n=5174&amp;s=music&amp;v=glance">Arrested Development - Season One</a></li>
<li>favicon.ico</li>
<li>Pizza + beer + WoW with my brother at my family&rsquo;s place in San Francisco</li>
<li>Uncomfortable honesty</li>
<li>A dream in progress</li>
<li>Strong community</li>
<li>Hope that doesn&rsquo;t die for some reason</li>
</ul>
<p>(OK, I did get a little deep at the end; I couldn&rsquo;t help it!)</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Serenity</title><link>https://blog.jlipps.com/2005/10/serenity/</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:15:13 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanlipps.com/blog/?p=294</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On a spur of the moment, I went to see the last showing of &lt;em&gt;Serenity&lt;/em&gt; tonight at a local theater. I&amp;rsquo;d seen previews for it during &lt;em&gt;Batman Begins&lt;/em&gt;, and thought, &amp;ldquo;Oh no, another mediocre sci-fi flick with none-too-great special effects and bad acting.&amp;rdquo; But since it opened a few days ago, I&amp;rsquo;ve been hearing nothing but positive things from people whom I trust to know better, so I thought I&amp;rsquo;d give it a chance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My conclusion, after seeing it, was that it&amp;rsquo;s probably the best sci-fi movie I have seen in the theaters, for as long as I can remember. The problem with sci-fi movies is that they&amp;rsquo;re typically either &amp;ldquo;sci-fi&amp;rdquo;, meaning, not sci-fi in spirit, but set in space, so everyone thinks it&amp;rsquo;s sci-fi, or that they&amp;rsquo;re sci-fi in spirit, but horribly written and acted or produced.&lt;/p&gt;</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a spur of the moment, I went to see the last showing of <em>Serenity</em> tonight at a local theater. I&rsquo;d seen previews for it during <em>Batman Begins</em>, and thought, &ldquo;Oh no, another mediocre sci-fi flick with none-too-great special effects and bad acting.&rdquo; But since it opened a few days ago, I&rsquo;ve been hearing nothing but positive things from people whom I trust to know better, so I thought I&rsquo;d give it a chance.</p>
<p>My conclusion, after seeing it, was that it&rsquo;s probably the best sci-fi movie I have seen in the theaters, for as long as I can remember. The problem with sci-fi movies is that they&rsquo;re typically either &ldquo;sci-fi&rdquo;, meaning, not sci-fi in spirit, but set in space, so everyone thinks it&rsquo;s sci-fi, or that they&rsquo;re sci-fi in spirit, but horribly written and acted or produced.</p>
<p>So, movies like <em>The Matrix</em> and <em>Star Wars</em> fall into the former category, because they are clearly not in the sci-fi genre, though being set in space and/or a digital reality. (What exactly counts as sci-fi I&rsquo;ll leave for a later blog entry, but if you&rsquo;ve read <em>Dune</em> or pretty much any Asimov, you&rsquo;ll know what I mean).</p>
<p>Speaking of <em>Dune</em>, the Sci-Fi Channel&rsquo;s miniseries <em>The Children of Dune</em> is a great example of the second category&ndash;great sci-fi world and story, but poor execution. Granted, it was the best they could do, and after seeing <em>The Village</em>, I retroactively liked William Hurt in <em>The Children of Dune</em>, but in the end that&rsquo;s no excuse.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say, then, that while the <em>Serenity</em> <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/serenity/">trailer</a> looked like another Sci-Fi channel blunder, the movie itself was a real joy to watch. The characters, which given the trailer I thought would be overdramatic and overacted, were actually very nuanced and well-done in the movie viewed as a whole. They were, for lack of a better word, believable! That&rsquo;s sci-fi&rsquo;s greatest challenge&ndash;to make a set of believable characters in a barely-believable world. Almost 100% of the time, either the writer or the actor makes some serious mistakes in that task.</p>
<p>But anyway, that strength held the movie together and made it something I will definitely want to see again. The effects actually looked worse in the trailer, too&ndash;all clunky old-school CGI. I mean, it was there in the movie as well, but it looks like they picked some of the cheesiest renders for the trailer, and in the movie you didn&rsquo;t really notice it.</p>
<p>The cinematography, while not groundbreaking, was just plain <em>interesting</em>. It was never boring, and steered mostly clear of the clichÃ©d action-movie shot sequences.</p>
<p>Lastly, the writing was fun in that the dialect(s) of English being spoken in the movie were subtly different, mixing some archaisms and some neologisms, and some things that I&rsquo;d never heard before. It added to the believability of the story taking place in a post-Earth solar system.</p>
<p>The movie also had some morals you could extrapolate about human nature and creation and control, but it didn&rsquo;t beat you over the head with it so neither will I.</p>
<p>Bottom line: if you consider yourself a fan of true sci-fi, you&rsquo;ll love this movie. If you don&rsquo;t, it may be because you&rsquo;ve never actually seen a true sci-fi movie done well, so give it a shot anyhow.</p>
<p>Man, when did I turn into a movie reviews site. This is weird!</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>